Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Belarus
0.188 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.1953 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Belarus rank
9th
Zimbabwe rank
8th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1953 1000 Int$ per person against 0.188 1000 Int$ per person in Belarus, a difference of 0.0073 1000 Int$ per person.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 167 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1248 1000 Int$ per person 0.2032 1000 Int$ per person 0.0785 1000 Int$ per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1051 1000 Int$ per person 0.1976 1000 Int$ per person 0.0924 1000 Int$ per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1433 1000 Int$ per person 0.1924 1000 Int$ per person 0.0491 1000 Int$ per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.1683 1000 Int$ per person 0.1898 1000 Int$ per person 0.0215 1000 Int$ per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.1953 1000 Int$ per person against 0.188 1000 Int$ per person in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
0.0073 1000 Int$ per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Belarus ranks 9th and Zimbabwe ranks 8th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-4/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,460 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.