Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Costa Rica
8.88 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda
7.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Costa Rica rank
17th
Rwanda rank
20th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Rwanda
-20020196219932024

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 8.88 % change on previous year against 7.31 % change on previous year in Rwanda, a difference of 1.57 % change on previous year.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 29 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Rwanda ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 144 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 5.22 % change on previous year 6.17 % change on previous year 0.9491 % change on previous year Rwanda
1970s 7.89 % change on previous year 6.35 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year Costa Rica
1980s 0.8323 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year 1.3 % change on previous year Rwanda
1990s 0.4653 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year 2.49 % change on previous year Rwanda
2000s 1.49 % change on previous year 7.59 % change on previous year 6.1 % change on previous year Rwanda
2010s -0.3252 % change on previous year 0.7568 % change on previous year 1.08 % change on previous year Rwanda
2020s 1.31 % change on previous year 3.52 % change on previous year 2.21 % change on previous year Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Costa Rica or Rwanda?
Costa Rica, at 8.88 % change on previous year against 7.31 % change on previous year in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Costa Rica and Rwanda?
1.57 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Costa Rica and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Costa Rica ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/costa-rica/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/costa-rica/rwanda/">Costa Rica vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 9,652 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.