China, Hong Kong SAR vs Least Developed Countries (LDCs): Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 6.99 % change on previous year against 0.4906 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 6.5 % change on previous year.
That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 14.2 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 18 times across 53 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 23rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 20th of 144 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.59 % change on previous year | 2.78 % change on previous year | 0.8112 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 1970s | 0 % change on previous year | 1.88 % change on previous year | 1.88 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1980s | -52.92 % change on previous year | 2.25 % change on previous year | 55.17 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 1990s | -3.33 % change on previous year | 10.35 % change on previous year | 13.68 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2000s | -49.09 % change on previous year | 4.13 % change on previous year | 53.22 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2010s | -12.27 % change on previous year | 1.64 % change on previous year | 13.9 % change on previous year | Least Developed Countries (LDCs) |
| 2020s | 11.18 % change on previous year | 1.99 % change on previous year | 9.2 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, China, Hong Kong SAR or Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 6.99 % change on previous year against 0.4906 % change on previous year in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between China, Hong Kong SAR and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 6.5 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Least Developed Countries (LDCs)?
- 53 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 23rd and Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 20th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.