Austria vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Austria
-0.6463 % change on previous year
in 2017
New Zealand
-0.3229 % change on previous year
in 2024
Austria rank
75th
New Zealand rank
72nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Austria
  • New Zealand
-20-100102030196219932024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports -0.3229 % change on previous year against -0.6463 % change on previous year in Austria, a difference of 0.3234 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was New Zealand ahead.

Austria ranks 75th and New Zealand ranks 72nd of 144 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 2.84 % change on previous year 6.04 % change on previous year 3.2 % change on previous year New Zealand
1970s 2.42 % change on previous year 3.96 % change on previous year 1.54 % change on previous year New Zealand
1980s 1.08 % change on previous year 1.22 % change on previous year 0.1399 % change on previous year New Zealand
1990s -0.1537 % change on previous year 0.319 % change on previous year 0.4728 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 1.02 % change on previous year 1.57 % change on previous year 0.5509 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s 0.1576 % change on previous year 0.1469 % change on previous year 0.0107 % change on previous year Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Austria or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at -0.3229 % change on previous year against -0.6463 % change on previous year in Austria as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Austria and New Zealand?
0.3234 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and New Zealand?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Austria and New Zealand rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Austria ranks 75th and New Zealand ranks 72nd of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/austria/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/austria/new-zealand/">Austria vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 9,652 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.