Australia vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- Australia
- Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 15.88 % change on previous year against 2.33 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 13.55 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia's figure about 6.8 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th of 144 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.28 % change on previous year | 2.72 % change on previous year | 2.56 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1970s | 8.46 % change on previous year | 3.18 % change on previous year | 5.28 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 1980s | -2.49 % change on previous year | 1.74 % change on previous year | 4.23 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 1990s | 3.12 % change on previous year | 8.15 % change on previous year | 5.03 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.5165 % change on previous year | 3.13 % change on previous year | 2.62 % change on previous year | Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.76 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | 0.1402 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 2020s | 2.09 % change on previous year | 1.21 % change on previous year | 0.879 % change on previous year | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- Australia, at 15.88 % change on previous year against 2.33 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 13.55 % change on previous year, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Australia ranks 6th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 9th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.