Australia and New Zealand vs Equatorial Guinea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 12.79 % change on previous year against 10.97 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 1.82 % change on previous year.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 31 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 11th of 144 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 5 and Equatorial Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.44 % change on previous year | 2.33 % change on previous year | 3.11 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 7.05 % change on previous year | 2.51 % change on previous year | 4.54 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -1.51 % change on previous year | 1.62 % change on previous year | 3.13 % change on previous year | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1990s | 2.15 % change on previous year | 0.9051 % change on previous year | 1.24 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.7651 % change on previous year | 1.09 % change on previous year | 0.3213 % change on previous year | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.7798 % change on previous year | -25.5 % change on previous year | 26.28 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 2.34 % change on previous year | -11.21 % change on previous year | 13.55 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia and New Zealand or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 12.79 % change on previous year against 10.97 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and New Zealand and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.82 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Equatorial Guinea?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 13th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 11th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.