Argentina vs Cameroon: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Argentina
-3.32 % change on previous year
in 2024
Cameroon
-3.07 % change on previous year
in 2024
Argentina rank
99th
Cameroon rank
96th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Argentina
  • Cameroon
-20020196219932024

How they compare

Cameroon currently reports -3.07 % change on previous year against -3.32 % change on previous year in Argentina, a difference of 0.25 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 33 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Argentina ahead.

Argentina ranks 99th and Cameroon ranks 96th of 144 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Cameroon in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Cameroon Difference Ahead
1960s 4.48 % change on previous year 1.64 % change on previous year 2.84 % change on previous year Argentina
1970s 1.14 % change on previous year 5.48 % change on previous year 4.34 % change on previous year Cameroon
1980s -1.31 % change on previous year 6 % change on previous year 7.31 % change on previous year Cameroon
1990s 0.8653 % change on previous year 3.18 % change on previous year 2.31 % change on previous year Cameroon
2000s 2.39 % change on previous year 1.34 % change on previous year 1.05 % change on previous year Argentina
2010s -0.3206 % change on previous year 1.56 % change on previous year 1.88 % change on previous year Cameroon
2020s 0.3647 % change on previous year 3.19 % change on previous year 2.83 % change on previous year Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Argentina or Cameroon?
Cameroon, at -3.07 % change on previous year against -3.32 % change on previous year in Argentina as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Argentina and Cameroon?
0.25 % change on previous year, with Cameroon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cameroon?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Argentina and Cameroon rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Argentina ranks 99th and Cameroon ranks 96th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Cameroon: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/argentina/cameroon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/argentina/cameroon/">Argentina vs Cameroon: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 9,652 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.