Americas vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Americas
0.8887 % change on previous year
in 2024
Rwanda
7.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Americas rank
18th
Rwanda rank
20th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Americas
  • Rwanda
-20020196219932024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 7.31 % change on previous year against 0.8887 % change on previous year in Americas, a difference of 6.42 % change on previous year.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 8.2 times Americas's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Rwanda ahead.

Americas ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 30 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Americas averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Americas Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 3.67 % change on previous year 6.17 % change on previous year 2.5 % change on previous year Rwanda
1970s 0.7537 % change on previous year 6.35 % change on previous year 5.6 % change on previous year Rwanda
1980s 0.8007 % change on previous year 2.13 % change on previous year 1.33 % change on previous year Rwanda
1990s 3.96 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year 1.01 % change on previous year Americas
2000s 0.7079 % change on previous year 7.59 % change on previous year 6.88 % change on previous year Rwanda
2010s -1.34 % change on previous year 0.7568 % change on previous year 2.09 % change on previous year Rwanda
2020s 1.42 % change on previous year 3.52 % change on previous year 2.1 % change on previous year Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Americas or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 7.31 % change on previous year against 0.8887 % change on previous year in Americas as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Americas and Rwanda?
6.42 % change on previous year, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Americas and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Americas and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Americas ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 20th of 30 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Americas vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/americas/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-11/americas/rwanda/">Americas vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
174 places, 9,652 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.