Uruguay vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Uruguay
10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
10.23 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2022
Uruguay rank
11th
Palestine rank
13th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Uruguay
  • Palestine
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.23 1000 USD per square kilometre in Palestine, a difference of 0.46 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Uruguay ahead.

Uruguay ranks 11th and Palestine ranks 13th of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Uruguay averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Uruguay Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 7.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.52 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 8.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.52 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 9.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.05 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 10.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.37 1000 USD per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Uruguay or Palestine?
Uruguay, at 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.23 1000 USD per square kilometre in Palestine as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Uruguay and Palestine?
0.46 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Uruguay and Palestine rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Uruguay ranks 11th and Palestine ranks 13th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Uruguay vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/uruguay/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/uruguay/west-bank-and-gaza/">Uruguay vs Palestine: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.