Thailand vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Thailand
1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Thailand rank
70th
Zambia rank
69th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Thailand
  • Zambia
0123196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Thailand ahead.

Thailand ranks 70th and Zambia ranks 69th of 122 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Thailand Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.773 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1254 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6475 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1970s 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.136 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9989 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1980s 1.5 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1613 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.34 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
1990s 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2831 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2000s 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3848 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8037 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2010s 1.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9074 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5032 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand
2020s 1.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9963 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2476 1000 USD per square kilometre Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Thailand or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre in Thailand as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Thailand and Zambia?
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Thailand and Zambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Thailand ranks 70th and Zambia ranks 69th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Thailand vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/thailand/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/thailand/zambia/">Thailand vs Zambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.