How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Serbia?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Pakistan vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Pakistan

3.53 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Serbia

3.66 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Pakistan rank

33rd

Serbia rank

32nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Pakistan
Serbia

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 3.66 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.53 1000 USD per square kilometre in Pakistan, a difference of 0.13 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Pakistan ranks 33rd and Serbia ranks 32nd of 122 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Pakistan	Serbia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.41 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.38 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2010s	3.14 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.43 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2952 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia
2020s	3.44 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.48 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0387 1000 USD per square kilometre	Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Pakistan or Serbia?: Serbia, at 3.66 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.53 1000 USD per square kilometre in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Pakistan and Serbia?: 0.13 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Serbia?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Serbia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Pakistan ranks 33rd and Serbia ranks 32nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/pakistan/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/pakistan/serbia/">Pakistan vs Serbia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.