Mexico vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Mexico
4.21 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
4.07 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico rank
26th
Rwanda rank
29th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Mexico
  • Rwanda
01234196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 4.21 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.

Mexico ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 122 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 6 and Rwanda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9069 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5658 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3411 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9262 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1867 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5503 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 2.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.1 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 2.95 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2696 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 3.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2879 1000 USD per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 4.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0208 1000 USD per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Mexico or Rwanda?
Mexico, at 4.21 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Mexico and Rwanda?
0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mexico and Rwanda rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Mexico ranks 26th and Rwanda ranks 29th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/mexico/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/mexico/rwanda/">Mexico vs Rwanda: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.