How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Latvia

0.5678 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Singapore

0.5947 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

92nd

Singapore rank

90th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Latvia
Singapore

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.5947 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5678 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.0269 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 92nd and Singapore ranks 90th of 122 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Singapore	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.436 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.6134 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.6227 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0093 1000 USD per square kilometre	Singapore
2010s	0.557 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.6894 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1325 1000 USD per square kilometre	Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Latvia or Singapore?: Singapore, at 0.5947 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5678 1000 USD per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Latvia and Singapore?: 0.0269 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Singapore?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Singapore rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Latvia ranks 92nd and Singapore ranks 90th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/singapore/">Latvia vs Singapore: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.