How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Latvia vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Latvia

0.5678 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Peru

0.5235 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Latvia rank

92nd

Peru rank

95th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Latvia
Peru

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 0.5678 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5235 1000 USD per square kilometre in Peru, a difference of 0.0443 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Peru's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 92nd and Peru ranks 95th of 122 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Latvia	Peru	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2963 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2000s	0.6134 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3898 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.2236 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia
2010s	0.557 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.4953 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0617 1000 USD per square kilometre	Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Latvia or Peru?: Latvia, at 0.5678 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.5235 1000 USD per square kilometre in Peru as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Latvia and Peru?: 0.0443 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Peru?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Latvia and Peru rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Latvia ranks 92nd and Peru ranks 95th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/latvia/peru/">Latvia vs Peru: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.