How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Slovenia?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Italy vs Slovenia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Italy

7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Slovenia

6.98 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Italy rank

17th

Slovenia rank

18th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Italy
Slovenia

How they compare

Italy currently reports 7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.98 1000 USD per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.35 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Italy ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 18th of 122 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Italy	Slovenia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	14.03 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.25 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.78 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy
2000s	13.48 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.94 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.54 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy
2010s	9.45 1000 USD per square kilometre	6.65 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Italy or Slovenia?: Italy, at 7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.98 1000 USD per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Italy and Slovenia?: 0.35 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Slovenia?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Italy and Slovenia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Italy ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 18th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Slovenia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/italy/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/italy/slovenia/">Italy vs Slovenia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.