Italy vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Italy
7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
New Zealand
8.98 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Italy rank
17th
New Zealand rank
15th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Italy
  • New Zealand
2.557.51012.515196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 8.98 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 15th of 122 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.11 1000 USD per square kilometre Italy
1970s 10.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.41 1000 USD per square kilometre Italy
1980s 11.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.26 1000 USD per square kilometre Italy
1990s 13.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.8 1000 USD per square kilometre Italy
2000s 13.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.88 1000 USD per square kilometre Italy
2010s 9.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Italy or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 8.98 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre in Italy as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Italy and New Zealand?
1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and New Zealand?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Italy and New Zealand rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Italy ranks 17th and New Zealand ranks 15th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/italy/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/italy/new-zealand/">Italy vs New Zealand: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.