Hungary vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Hungary
0.8518 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Nigeria
0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
81st
Nigeria rank
78th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Hungary
  • Nigeria
012345196119922023

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8518 1000 USD per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 0.0442 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 81st and Nigeria ranks 78th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 5 and Nigeria in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 3.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3123 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.06 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 3.95 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4624 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.49 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 4.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7919 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.25 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 2.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6076 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7518 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4944 1000 USD per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 0.8023 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8391 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0368 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Hungary or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8518 1000 USD per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Hungary and Nigeria?
0.0442 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Nigeria?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Hungary and Nigeria rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Hungary ranks 81st and Nigeria ranks 78th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/hungary/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/hungary/nigeria/">Hungary vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.