How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Lithuania?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guinea vs Lithuania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Guinea

1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Guinea rank

68th

Lithuania rank

65th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Guinea
Lithuania

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guinea, a difference of 0.2 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Guinea's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 68th and Lithuania ranks 65th of 122 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guinea	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.3794 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.85 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.47 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2000s	0.5763 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania
2010s	1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3542 1000 USD per square kilometre	Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Guinea or Lithuania?: Lithuania, at 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guinea as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Guinea and Lithuania?: 0.2 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Lithuania?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Guinea and Lithuania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Guinea ranks 68th and Lithuania ranks 65th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea vs Lithuania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/guinea/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/guinea/lithuania/">Guinea vs Lithuania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.