Germany vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Germany
12.17 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Uruguay
10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany rank
8th
Uruguay rank
11th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Germany
  • Uruguay
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 12.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre in Uruguay, a difference of 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 8th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 122 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 14.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.41 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1970s 18.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.34 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1980s 21.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.83 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1990s 17.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.58 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
2000s 13.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.66 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
2010s 12.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.43 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.9 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Germany or Uruguay?
Germany, at 12.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre in Uruguay as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Germany and Uruguay?
1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Uruguay?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Germany and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Germany ranks 8th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/germany/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/germany/uruguay/">Germany vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.