Germany vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Germany
12.17 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Malta
11.52 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Germany rank
8th
Malta rank
10th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Germany
  • Malta
0510152025196119892017

How they compare

Germany currently reports 12.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 11.52 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 0.65 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 8th and Malta ranks 10th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 5 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 14.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.8 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1970s 18.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.86 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.29 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1980s 21.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.87 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1990s 17.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6483 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
2000s 13.29 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.7 1000 USD per square kilometre Malta
2010s 12.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5306 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Germany or Malta?
Germany, at 12.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 11.52 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malta as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Germany and Malta?
0.65 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Germany and Malta rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Germany ranks 8th and Malta ranks 10th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/germany/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/germany/malta/">Germany vs Malta: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.