How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Romania?

24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Georgia vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Georgia

1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Romania

1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Georgia rank

63rd

Romania rank

62nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Georgia
Romania

How they compare

Romania currently reports 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre in Georgia, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Romania ahead.

Georgia ranks 63rd and Romania ranks 62nd of 122 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Georgia	Romania	Difference	Ahead
1990s	3.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.53 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.6349 1000 USD per square kilometre	Georgia
2000s	2.65 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.19 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.46 1000 USD per square kilometre	Georgia
2010s	1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.61 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1905 1000 USD per square kilometre	Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Georgia or Romania?: Romania, at 1.49 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre in Georgia as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Georgia and Romania?: 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Romania?: 24 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2017.
How do Georgia and Romania rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Georgia ranks 63rd and Romania ranks 62nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/georgia/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/georgia/romania/">Georgia vs Romania: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.