Finland vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Finland
0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Sweden
0.8691 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Finland rank
77th
Sweden rank
79th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Finland
  • Sweden
00.511.5196119892017

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8691 1000 USD per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.1112 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Finland ranks 77th and Sweden ranks 79th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 USD per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9471 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2861 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1980s 1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.986 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3756 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1990s 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9161 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2744 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9198 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0894 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.9557 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8767 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.079 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Finland or Sweden?
Finland, at 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8691 1000 USD per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Finland and Sweden?
0.1112 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Sweden?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Sweden rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Finland ranks 77th and Sweden ranks 79th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/finland/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/finland/sweden/">Finland vs Sweden: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.