Finland vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Finland
0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Nigeria
0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
77th
Nigeria rank
78th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Finland
  • Nigeria
0.250.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0843 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 77th and Nigeria ranks 78th of 122 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3123 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7062 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1970s 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4624 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7708 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1980s 1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7919 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5698 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1990s 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6076 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5828 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7518 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2573 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.9557 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8391 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1166 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Finland or Nigeria?
Finland, at 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.896 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Finland and Nigeria?
0.0843 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Nigeria?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Finland and Nigeria rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Finland ranks 77th and Nigeria ranks 78th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/finland/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/finland/nigeria/">Finland vs Nigeria: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.