Dominican Republic vs Eritrea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Dominican Republic
2.7 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Eritrea
2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic rank
44th
Eritrea rank
43rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Eritrea
12345196119922023

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.7 1000 USD per square kilometre in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Dominican Republic ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Eritrea ranks 43rd of 122 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Eritrea Difference Ahead
1990s 2.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 3.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.42 1000 USD per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 3.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2020s 2.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0439 1000 USD per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Dominican Republic or Eritrea?
Eritrea, at 2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.7 1000 USD per square kilometre in Dominican Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Dominican Republic and Eritrea?
0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Eritrea?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Dominican Republic and Eritrea rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Dominican Republic ranks 44th and Eritrea ranks 43rd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Eritrea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/dominican-republic/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/dominican-republic/eritrea/">Dominican Republic vs Eritrea: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.