How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Nicaragua?

25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Czechia vs Nicaragua: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Czechia

2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Nicaragua

2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Czechia rank

41st

Nicaragua rank

42nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Czechia
Nicaragua

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 41st and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 122 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Czechia	Nicaragua	Difference	Ahead
1990s	6.62 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.8916 1000 USD per square kilometre	5.73 1000 USD per square kilometre	Czechia
2000s	3.79 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.38 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	Czechia
2010s	2.84 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.22 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.621 1000 USD per square kilometre	Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Czechia or Nicaragua?: Czechia, at 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.74 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nicaragua as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Czechia and Nicaragua?: 0.04 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Nicaragua?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
How do Czechia and Nicaragua rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Czechia ranks 41st and Nicaragua ranks 42nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Nicaragua: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/czechia/nicaragua/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/czechia/nicaragua/">Czechia vs Nicaragua: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.