How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Spain?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Spain: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Croatia

3.2 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Spain

2.81 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Croatia rank

36th

Spain rank

39th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Croatia
Spain

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 3.2 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.81 1000 USD per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 0.39 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Croatia's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 36th and Spain ranks 39th of 122 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Spain	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.48 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre	Spain
2000s	0.3933 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.93 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.53 1000 USD per square kilometre	Spain
2010s	2.13 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.67 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5449 1000 USD per square kilometre	Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Croatia or Spain?: Croatia, at 3.2 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.81 1000 USD per square kilometre in Spain as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Croatia and Spain?: 0.39 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Spain?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Croatia and Spain rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Croatia ranks 36th and Spain ranks 39th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Spain: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/croatia/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/croatia/spain/">Croatia vs Spain: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.