How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Morocco?

26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Morocco: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Croatia

3.2 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Morocco

3.06 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Croatia rank

36th

Morocco rank

37th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Croatia
Morocco

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 3.2 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.06 1000 USD per square kilometre in Morocco, a difference of 0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 36th and Morocco ranks 37th of 122 countries.

Morocco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Morocco	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.3513 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco
2000s	0.3933 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.21 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.81 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco
2010s	2.13 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.22 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre	Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Croatia or Morocco?: Croatia, at 3.2 1000 USD per square kilometre against 3.06 1000 USD per square kilometre in Morocco as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Croatia and Morocco?: 0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Morocco?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Croatia and Morocco rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Croatia ranks 36th and Morocco ranks 37th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Morocco: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/croatia/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/croatia/morocco/">Croatia vs Morocco: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.