China vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

China
4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
5.63 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
China rank
23rd
Poland rank
22nd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • China
  • Poland
02468196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 5.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre in China, a difference of 0.68 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

China ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 22nd of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Poland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0716 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1970s 0.1228 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.32 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1980s 0.3209 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.74 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1990s 1.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.21 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2000s 3.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1714 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2010s 4.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5108 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, China or Poland?
Poland, at 5.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre in China as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between China and Poland?
0.68 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Poland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do China and Poland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
China ranks 23rd and Poland ranks 22nd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/china/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/china/poland/">China vs Poland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.