Chile vs Yemen: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chile
1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Yemen
1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
74th
Yemen rank
75th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chile
  • Yemen
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre in Yemen, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 74th and Yemen ranks 75th of 122 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Yemen Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6744 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2138 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4607 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.8171 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2297 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5873 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1980s 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3192 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7168 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1990s 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3849 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9295 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7251 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4747 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9097 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2319 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9646 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1486 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chile or Yemen?
Chile, at 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre in Yemen as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chile and Yemen?
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Yemen?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Yemen rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chile ranks 74th and Yemen ranks 75th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Yemen: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/yemen-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/yemen-rep/">Chile vs Yemen: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.