Chile vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chile
1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
74th
Gambia rank
71st

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chile
  • Gambia
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Chile ranks 74th and Gambia ranks 71st of 122 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Gambia in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6744 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5713 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 0.8171 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8079 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.37 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3339 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4823 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5389 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 1.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0247 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chile or Gambia?
Gambia, at 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chile and Gambia?
0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Gambia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chile ranks 74th and Gambia ranks 71st of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/gambia-the/">Chile vs Gambia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.