Chile vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chile
1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Chile rank
74th
Finland rank
77th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chile
  • Finland
0.250.50.7511.21.5196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0497 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Chile ranks 74th and Finland ranks 77th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Finland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6744 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3441 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.8171 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4161 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1980s 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3257 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1990s 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1239 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1906 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9557 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1917 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chile or Finland?
Chile, at 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chile and Finland?
0.0497 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Finland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Chile and Finland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chile ranks 74th and Finland ranks 77th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chile/finland/">Chile vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.