Chad vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Chad
0.8528 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Chad rank
80th
Finland rank
77th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Chad
  • Finland
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8528 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.1275 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 80th and Finland ranks 77th of 122 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0533 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9652 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.0602 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.1242 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.24 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.2117 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9738 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.3495 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6597 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.552 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9557 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4036 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Chad or Finland?
Finland, at 0.9803 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8528 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Chad and Finland?
0.1275 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Finland?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Chad and Finland rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Chad ranks 80th and Finland ranks 77th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chad/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/chad/finland/">Chad vs Finland: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.