Brazil vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Brazil
2.51 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
48th
Malawi rank
50th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Brazil
  • Malawi
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 2.51 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.28 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 48th and Malawi ranks 50th of 122 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4191 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1803 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2388 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.6172 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2873 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.33 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1980s 0.9664 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4845 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4819 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
1990s 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5172 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6131 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2000s 1.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7532 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5206 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2010s 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4055 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 2.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2355 1000 USD per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Brazil or Malawi?
Brazil, at 2.51 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Brazil and Malawi?
0.28 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Malawi rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Brazil ranks 48th and Malawi ranks 50th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/brazil/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/brazil/malawi/">Brazil vs Malawi: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.