Belarus vs China: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Belarus
4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China
4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
24th
China rank
23rd

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Belarus
  • China
012345196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.39 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 24th and China ranks 23rd of 122 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus China Difference Ahead
1990s 3.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 3.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7139 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2010s 3.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2861 1000 USD per square kilometre China
2020s 4.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3766 1000 USD per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Belarus or China?
China, at 4.95 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Belarus and China?
0.39 1000 USD per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
30 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2023.
How do Belarus and China rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Belarus ranks 24th and China ranks 23rd of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs China: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/belarus/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/belarus/china/">Belarus vs China: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.