Austria vs Denmark: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Austria
12.15 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Denmark
10.41 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Austria rank
9th
Denmark rank
12th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Austria
  • Denmark
5101520196119892017

How they compare

Austria currently reports 12.15 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.41 1000 USD per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Denmark's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Denmark ahead.

Austria ranks 9th and Denmark ranks 12th of 122 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Denmark in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Denmark Difference Ahead
1960s 7.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.55 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
1970s 9.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 18.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.01 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
1980s 11.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 19.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
1990s 11.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.1 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
2000s 11.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4009 1000 USD per square kilometre Denmark
2010s 12.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.39 1000 USD per square kilometre Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Austria or Denmark?
Austria, at 12.15 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.41 1000 USD per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2017.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Austria and Denmark?
1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Denmark?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Austria and Denmark rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Austria ranks 9th and Denmark ranks 12th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Denmark: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/austria/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/austria/denmark/">Austria vs Denmark: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.