Australia vs Estonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Australia
0.7064 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Estonia
0.6491 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2017
Australia rank
87th
Estonia rank
89th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Australia
  • Estonia
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.7064 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6491 1000 USD per square kilometre in Estonia, a difference of 0.0573 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.

Australia ranks 87th and Estonia ranks 89th of 122 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5841 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9757 1000 USD per square kilometre Estonia
2000s 0.6633 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8063 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.143 1000 USD per square kilometre Estonia
2010s 0.7281 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6646 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0634 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Australia or Estonia?
Australia, at 0.7064 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.6491 1000 USD per square kilometre in Estonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Australia and Estonia?
0.0573 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Estonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
How do Australia and Estonia rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Australia ranks 87th and Estonia ranks 89th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Estonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/australia/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/australia/estonia/">Australia vs Estonia: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.