Armenia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Armenia
9.44 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Armenia rank
14th
Uruguay rank
11th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

  • Armenia
  • Uruguay
02.557.510196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.44 1000 USD per square kilometre in Armenia, a difference of 1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Uruguay ahead.

Armenia ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 122 countries.

Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 5.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.85 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2000s 5.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.9 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2010s 9.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4044 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 10.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0151 1000 USD per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Armenia or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.44 1000 USD per square kilometre in Armenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Armenia and Uruguay?
1.25 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Uruguay?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Armenia and Uruguay rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?
Armenia ranks 14th and Uruguay ranks 11th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/armenia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/armenia/uruguay/">Armenia vs Uruguay: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.