How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Italy?

21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Italy: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross

Armenia

9.44 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Italy

7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2017

Armenia rank

14th

Italy rank

17th

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross over time

Armenia
Italy

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 9.44 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre in Italy, a difference of 2.11 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.3 times Italy's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Italy ahead.

Armenia ranks 14th and Italy ranks 17th of 122 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Italy	Difference	Ahead
1990s	5.25 1000 USD per square kilometre	13.19 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.94 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy
2000s	5.73 1000 USD per square kilometre	13.48 1000 USD per square kilometre	7.75 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy
2010s	8.88 1000 USD per square kilometre	9.45 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.5695 1000 USD per square kilometre	Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross, Armenia or Italy?: Armenia, at 9.44 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.33 1000 USD per square kilometre in Italy as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross between Armenia and Italy?: 2.11 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Italy?: 21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2017.
How do Armenia and Italy rank globally for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — gross?: Armenia ranks 14th and Italy ranks 17th of 122 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Italy: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/armenia/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-of-cattle-with-the-bone-fresh-or-chilled-indigenous-gross-production-value-constant-10/armenia/italy/">Armenia vs Italy: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 123 places, 6,672 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 02 October 2026

Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled (indigenous) — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.