How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Qatar?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malta vs Qatar: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Malta

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Qatar

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malta rank

115th

Qatar rank

118th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Malta
Qatar

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Qatar, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 115th and Qatar ranks 118th of 123 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malta	Qatar	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malta or Qatar?: Malta, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Qatar as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malta and Qatar?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Qatar?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Malta and Qatar rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Malta ranks 115th and Qatar ranks 118th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Qatar: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/malta/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of/malta/qatar/">Malta vs Qatar: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 124 places, 6,659 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.