Romania vs Tunisia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Romania
7.31 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
7.07 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
61st
Tunisia rank
63rd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Romania
  • Tunisia
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 7.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 0.24 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Romania ranks 61st and Tunisia ranks 63rd of 123 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 7.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.61 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1970s 14.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.45 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1980s 16.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 14.19 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
1990s 13.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.03 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2000s 10.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2010s 9.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.86 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania
2020s 7.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5936 1000 USD per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Romania or Tunisia?
Romania, at 7.31 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.07 1000 USD per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Romania and Tunisia?
0.24 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Tunisia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Romania and Tunisia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Romania ranks 61st and Tunisia ranks 63rd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs Tunisia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/romania/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/romania/tunisia/">Romania vs Tunisia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.