India vs Puerto Rico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

India
9.55 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico
9.88 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
51st
Puerto Rico rank
49th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • India
  • Puerto Rico
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 9.88 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.55 1000 USD per square kilometre in India, a difference of 0.33 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Puerto Rico has been ahead every year.

India ranks 51st and Puerto Rico ranks 49th of 123 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9212 1000 USD per square kilometre 21.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 20.54 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre 29.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 28.03 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 1.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 33.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 1.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 29.43 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 3.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 20.53 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.53 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 5.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 15.21 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.26 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 8.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.76 1000 USD per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), India or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 9.88 1000 USD per square kilometre against 9.55 1000 USD per square kilometre in India as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between India and Puerto Rico?
0.33 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Puerto Rico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do India and Puerto Rico rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
India ranks 51st and Puerto Rico ranks 49th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Puerto Rico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/india/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/india/puerto-rico-us/">India vs Puerto Rico: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.