Colombia vs Tunisia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Colombia
6.75 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
7.07 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
64th
Tunisia rank
63rd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Colombia
  • Tunisia
2468196119922023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 7.07 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.75 1000 USD per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 0.32 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tunisia ahead.

Colombia ranks 64th and Tunisia ranks 63rd of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.036 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
1970s 1.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0159 1000 USD per square kilometre Colombia
1980s 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 3.08 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.66 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5826 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 3.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.12 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 5.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6126 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 6.51 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4774 1000 USD per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Colombia or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 7.07 1000 USD per square kilometre against 6.75 1000 USD per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Colombia and Tunisia?
0.32 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Tunisia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Tunisia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Colombia ranks 64th and Tunisia ranks 63rd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Tunisia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/colombia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/colombia/tunisia/">Colombia vs Tunisia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.