Chile vs Nigeria: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Nigeria
4.34 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
80th
Nigeria rank
82nd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Nigeria
12345196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.34 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria, a difference of 0.22 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 80th and Nigeria ranks 82nd of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Nigeria in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Nigeria Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9319 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8092 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1228 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
1970s 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0471 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1980s 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3865 1000 USD per square kilometre Nigeria
1990s 2.53 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2893 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2000s 3.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5076 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2010s 4.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7084 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile
2020s 4.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3212 1000 USD per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Nigeria?
Chile, at 4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.34 1000 USD per square kilometre in Nigeria as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Nigeria?
0.22 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Nigeria?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Nigeria rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 80th and Nigeria ranks 82nd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Nigeria: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chile/nigeria/">Chile vs Nigeria: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.