Chad vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad
1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
102nd
Zambia rank
104th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chad
  • Zambia
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Chad currently reports 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia, a difference of 0.17 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Chad's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Chad ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 104th of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.083 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1623 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0793 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.1011 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2273 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1262 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.2015 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2647 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0632 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.2717 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.407 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1352 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.732 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6419 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad
2010s 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1371 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 1.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2703 1000 USD per square kilometre Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Zambia?
Chad, at 1.82 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre in Zambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Zambia?
0.17 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Zambia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chad ranks 102nd and Zambia ranks 104th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chad/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chad/zambia/">Chad vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.