Canada vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Canada
1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
105th
Zambia rank
104th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Canada
  • Zambia
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 104th of 123 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.6723 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1623 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.8529 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2273 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6256 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.9461 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2647 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6814 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.9243 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.407 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5173 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2000s 1.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6419 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7939 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2010s 1.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0528 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2020s 1.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2313 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Zambia?
Zambia, at 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre against 1.64 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Zambia?
0.01 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Zambia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 105th and Zambia ranks 104th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/zambia/">Canada vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.