Bulgaria vs Chile: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bulgaria
4.78 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bulgaria rank
79th
Chile rank
80th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Chile
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 4.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.22 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 79th and Chile ranks 80th of 123 countries.

Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Chile Difference Ahead
1960s 9.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9319 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.79 1000 USD per square kilometre Bulgaria
1970s 13.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.71 1000 USD per square kilometre Bulgaria
1980s 18.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.87 1000 USD per square kilometre Bulgaria
1990s 14.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.13 1000 USD per square kilometre Bulgaria
2000s 5.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre Bulgaria
2010s 4.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3779 1000 USD per square kilometre Bulgaria
2020s 4.7 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0542 1000 USD per square kilometre Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bulgaria or Chile?
Bulgaria, at 4.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.56 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bulgaria and Chile?
0.22 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Chile?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bulgaria and Chile rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bulgaria ranks 79th and Chile ranks 80th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Chile: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bulgaria/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bulgaria/chile/">Bulgaria vs Chile: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.