Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.7548 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
113th
Iceland rank
111th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Iceland
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.7548 1000 USD per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.4552 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.6 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Iceland ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Iceland ranks 111th of 123 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.453 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7836 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3306 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.8825 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1317 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.4306 1000 USD per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2281 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Iceland?
Iceland, at 1.21 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.7548 1000 USD per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
0.4552 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Iceland rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 113th and Iceland ranks 111th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/iceland/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Iceland: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.