Bhutan vs Namibia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
0.3556 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.1443 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
119th
Namibia rank
122nd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Namibia
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.3556 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1443 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.2113 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 2.5 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 119th and Namibia ranks 122nd of 123 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2562 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0786 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1775 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.3313 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1043 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.227 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.4588 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1076 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3511 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.1885 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1192 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0692 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.1795 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1371 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0423 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.2893 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1278 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1615 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.3946 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1212 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2734 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Namibia?
Bhutan, at 0.3556 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1443 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Namibia?
0.2113 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Namibia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 119th and Namibia ranks 122nd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Namibia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bhutan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/bhutan/namibia/">Bhutan vs Namibia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.