Argentina vs Jamaica: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Argentina
8.19 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
7.15 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Argentina rank
60th
Jamaica rank
62nd

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Argentina
  • Jamaica
2468196119922023

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 8.19 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.15 1000 USD per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 60th and Jamaica ranks 62nd of 123 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 5.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.11 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1970s 6.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.78 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1980s 6.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
1990s 6.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.73 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2000s 7.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.67 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2010s 7 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9726 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina
2020s 7.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.13 1000 USD per square kilometre Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Argentina or Jamaica?
Argentina, at 8.19 1000 USD per square kilometre against 7.15 1000 USD per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Argentina and Jamaica?
1.04 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Argentina and Jamaica rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Argentina ranks 60th and Jamaica ranks 62nd of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Jamaica: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/argentina/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/argentina/jamaica/">Argentina vs Jamaica: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
124 places, 6,959 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.