How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zambia?

50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Qatar vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Qatar

0.0498 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zambia

0.0553 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Qatar rank

90th

Zambia rank

88th

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Qatar
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0553 1000 USD per person against 0.0498 1000 USD per person in Qatar, a difference of 0.0055 1000 USD per person.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.

Qatar ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 88th of 123 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 6 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Qatar	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0958 1000 USD per person	0.0325 1000 USD per person	0.0633 1000 USD per person	Qatar
1970s	0.0369 1000 USD per person	0.0341 1000 USD per person	0.0028 1000 USD per person	Qatar
1980s	0.0428 1000 USD per person	0.0296 1000 USD per person	0.0132 1000 USD per person	Qatar
1990s	0.0638 1000 USD per person	0.0389 1000 USD per person	0.025 1000 USD per person	Qatar
2000s	0.0442 1000 USD per person	0.0376 1000 USD per person	0.0066 1000 USD per person	Qatar
2010s	0.0436 1000 USD per person	0.0591 1000 USD per person	0.0155 1000 USD per person	Zambia
2020s	0.0636 1000 USD per person	0.0528 1000 USD per person	0.0108 1000 USD per person	Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Qatar or Zambia?: Zambia, at 0.0553 1000 USD per person against 0.0498 1000 USD per person in Qatar as of 2024.
What is the difference in meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Qatar and Zambia?: 0.0055 1000 USD per person, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zambia?: 50 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Qatar and Zambia rank globally for meat indigenous, total — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Qatar ranks 90th and Zambia ranks 88th of 123 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/qatar/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/meat-indigenous-total-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/qatar/zambia/">Qatar vs Zambia: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 124 places, 7,081 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Meat indigenous, total — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.